Recently, Peter Woollen wrote a letter comparing Moms for Liberty (M4L) to the United Daughters of the Confederacy. It is crucial to recognize that the comparison made by Mr. Woollen between M4L and the United Daughters of the Confederacy is unfounded and biased.

In any debate, it is important to acknowledge and respect differing perspectives. Open and honest communication allows for a more comprehensive understanding of various viewpoints, promoting a constructive exchange of ideas. Unfortunately, Mr. Woollen seems to have used his position as a teacher to propagate falsehoods and biased opinions about M4L without having any substantial knowledge or experience with the group.


M4L supporters believe in the importance of parental involvement in their children’s education. They advocate for an educational system that reflects the cultural and moral values held by families, allowing parents to play an active role in instilling their chosen principles in their children’s learning journey.

M4L advocates also express concerns about certain books and curriculum materials. It is essential to understand that their objections are not against diversity or inclusivity but rather a desire for a balanced representation of different perspectives. They argue that some content might not be age-appropriate or present one-sided views, which not only defeats the purpose of diversity and inclusion but also could lead to misinformation or indoctrination.


Moreover, proponents of M4L advocate for local control over education, believing that decisions about curriculum and school policies should be made at the community level rather than being dictated by a centralized authority. This decentralized approach is thought to allow for greater responsiveness to the needs and preferences of the local community, fostering a more personalized and effective learning experience for students.

Engaging in fair and respectful discussions about education and societal values is important. Making unfair and biased comparisons, as Mr. Woollen did, only hinders the possibility of finding common ground and understanding among different groups. Promoting open dialogue and considering multiple perspectives is crucial to work toward a more inclusive and informed educational environment.